BEWARE! Post Quietly Pushing Out Employees
By Fredrick Kunkle
Guild Unit Co-Chair
Friends,
As some of you may have already heard or suspected after several cake-less departures this year, the Washington Post has pushed out – or is trying to push out – at least thirteen people through layoffs, coerced buyouts or outright dismissal on dubious charges.
What’s more troubling is that more than half of those employees are African-Americans or Latinos.
The script goes like this: an employee is summoned to a meeting where she hears that “the bar has been raised.” She is told her work does not meet this supposed new standard. She is handed an envelope with a buyout offer and given a deadline to surrender her job or face disciplinary action because of her allegedly poor performance. She is reminded that disciplinary action progresses from warnings to suspensions and termination.
Never mind that the people targeted so far have included veteran journalists with years of distinguished service. Or that talk of a “raised bar” comes as the Post relies more than ever on interns, bloggers, freelancers, readers or comically inexperienced content creators to fill pages. Or that some allegations of poor performance – as documented by the new, pseudoscientific evaluation system and its across-the-board top score of “3” – have included highly subjective and weaselly criticisms such as inserting too many pop culture references in stories. (We are not making this up.)
Other reasons worthy of disciplinary action? Not having enough sources. Not writing more “impact” stories. Not landing on A1 often enough. One staff writer was given a 30-day production quota as follows: at least one deeply textured A1 story, at least one news feature, profile or takeout worthy of the Metro front or A1, at least three dailies a week and at least three blog posts per week. No mention of a Twitter quota. Yet.
The reason for all this is, of course, money. The Washington Post lost $6.2 million in the third quarter of 2011. Newspaper circulation continues to skid by roughly 5 percent a year. Advertising revenues dropped 20 percent in print and 13 percent online.
We know it’s tough. But members of the Guild think that the Post’s direction is not only unfair, it’s unwise. That’s why we are calling on the Post to create a committee to address its approach to reducing staff.
But we are also calling on you. The time for fashionable apathy is past. The Guild needs you to become a dues-paying member and to become active. The Guild has stood by every member who has fought for his or her job or chosen to negotiate a buyout–-and, remember, the leverage for those negotiations is supplied by nothing less than the union contract that covers you and nearly half the employees in this company.
Find out today how to do your fair share for yourself and your fellow workers:
• Darlene Meyer, co-chair, Advertising, 334-7007
• Freddy Kunkle, co-chair, News, 202-302-3688
• Mike Gronowski, Advertising, 334-7087
• Nikita Stewart, News, 334-6988
• Stephen Richardson, Advertising, 334-7730
• Amy Quinto, Ad Ops, 334-4160
• James Crudup, Circ Delivery
• James Ward Circ Delivery
• Whitney Shefte, News, 704-467-4789
• Del Wilber, News, 202.302.7686
Print This Post
Filed under: Guild News | No Comments »



