A Sad Ending: A Discussion on the Closing of the Post’s Domestic Bureaus

By Jill Drew
Columbia Journalism Review
Beltway politicians and bureaucrats love to generalize about “the American people”—who they are, what they want, how they feel about federal policy. Now that The Washington Post has decided to close its last three national bureaus, in New York, Chicago and Los Angeles, more of those pronouncements will likely go unchallenged.

post paper

In a memo last week, the paper’s top editors said the cuts were necessitated by “limited resources and increased competitive pressure,” forcing the paper to concentrate on core subjects shaping life in the Washington region and on the country’s politics and policies.

It’s a shame—perhaps a financial necessity, given the bureaus’ not-insignificant expenses in a newspaper division that has already wracked up a $166.7 million operating loss for this year’s first nine months—but, still, a shame.

Landing a coveted job in a Post national bureau was like getting the chance to set up a journalistic boutique; talented writers and reporters were tasked with producing smart, detail-rich stories that enhanced, clarified, and often served as counter-programming to the paper’s hard-core politics and policy offerings.

The boutiques have a decades-long history of showcasing exquisite work from some of the nation’s best journalists.

To Read More

Leave a Reply

Untitled Document

Washington-Baltimore Newspaper Guild | Local 32035. The Newspaper Guild-Communications Workers of America
1100-15th Street, N.W.,Suite 350 . Washington, D.C. 20005-1707 next door to the Post | (202) 785-3650.Ext.16 | Fax: (202) 785-3659

©2008 Postguild.org. All Rights Reserved. | ©2007 Web Design & Development by DiamondGeeks.com